loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which form of Egyptian architecture is the tallest structure to the left of the center?
Which statement correctly describes the Maya calendar? A. It was based on the movements of the sun, moon, and stars. B. It developed from the Chavín and Moche c
Apply a four-point refutation about divorce
would setting rules for immigration be National power or State power?
Problem 6 and 7......
PLEASSEEE HELP These two campaign posters give information about two candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives. There are two text boxes side by side. Th
Which of the following is the main advantage of asexual reproduction? a genetic variety b speed of reproduction c reduced frequency of mutation d ability to fin
when a lower court asks the U.S. Supreme Court for advisement about a legal issue it is through this manner.
Of the five food groups which one should be consumed in the smallest amount? A) dairy B) fruits C) grains D) protein
Feudalism can be best said to have arisen out of which shared need of lords and peasents? A.faith B.land C.money D.security PLEASE HELP ME