The mean score for all NBA games during a particular season was less than 104 points per game. If a hypothesis test is performed, how should you interpret a decision that rejects the null hypothesis? a. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 104. b. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 104. c. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 104. d. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 104.

Respuesta :

Answer: c. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 104.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] be the population mean.

Given : The mean score for all NBA games during a particular season was less than 104 points per game.

It indicates for  Alternative hypothesis : [tex]H_a:\mu<104[/tex]

If null hypothesis is rejected then it means we get sufficient evidence to support alternative hypothesis.

i.e. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 104.

Hence, the correct answer =  c. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 104.